22 frameworks · 7 industries · senior practitioners CCPs on staff · CMMC L1 / L2 / FedRAMP-experienced
The standards we run against

Every framework that actually shows up in the audit.

Twenty-two standards across security, federal, privacy, and AI governance. Find yours by industry: if you know what your firm does but not what applies; or by framework: if you know the standard but want to see how we run it.

Cyber & compliance
13 frameworks
SOC 2 · ISO · CMMC · FedRAMP · PCI
Privacy
4 regimes
GDPR · Mass 201 · U.S. state · IRS
AI governance
5 frameworks
42001 · AI RMF · EU Act · LLM · ATLAS
Industries served
7 verticals
Healthcare → GovCon → SaaS
Audit in < 90 days?
Triage in 30 min
Senior call · scope, gaps, fit
Engaged by · GetAhead · Dedupely · Titan Intake · references on serious inquiry
Frameworks · Active Portfolio Practiced across security, federal, privacy, and AI governance.
§ I · Blended management system

One control set. Multiple audits.

A blended management system maps a single set of controls onto every framework that calls for them. Run the access review once: satisfy SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI, and 800-171 in the same motion. Write evidence once. Cite it everywhere.

See how we sequence audits
Live · one control firing across frameworks
CTRL · 06.1
Quarterly access review
Evidence ·
Q2 2026 · Okta export · 142 users
SOC 2
CC6.2
ISO 27001
A.5.18
HIPAA
§164.308(a)(4)
PCI DSS
7.1.4
NIST 800-171
3.1.5
1 control 5 audits satisfied
Common control
SOC 2 (TSC)
ISO 27001 : 2022
HIPAA Security
NIST 800-171
Logical access provisioning & review
CC6.1, CC6.2, CC6.3
A.5.15, A.5.16, A.5.18
§164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B–C); (a)(4)
3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.5
What you produce
A quarterly user-access review exported from your IdP: list of every user, their role, manager attestation that access is still appropriate, and remediation log for accounts removed.
Okta exportManager sign-offRemediation logJoiner/leaver tickets
Cited as
Same artifact, four citations. SOC 2 reads it as periodic access review (CC6.2). ISO as user-rights review (A.5.18). HIPAA as access authorization & modification (§164.308). NIST as account management (3.1.1, 3.1.5).
Encryption in transit & at rest
CC6.1, CC6.7
A.8.24
§164.312(a)(2)(iv); (e)(2)(ii)
3.5.10, 3.13.8, 3.13.16
What you produce
A cryptographic inventory: every data store and every transport with the algorithm, key length, key custodian, and rotation schedule. Plus a sampled config screenshot per system.
KMS configTLS posture reportAlgorithm inventoryKey rotation log
Cited as
SOC 2 cites it as logical & physical access (CC6.7). ISO as use of cryptography (A.8.24). HIPAA as encryption addressable specs. NIST as system & communications protection (3.13).
Vulnerability management & pentesting
CC7.1, CC4.1
A.8.8, A.8.29
§164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A–B); (a)(8)
3.11.2, 3.11.3, 3.14.1
What you produce
A vulnerability scan cadence + remediation log with mean time to remediate by severity, plus your most recent third-party pentest report and management response.
Qualys / Tenable scansMTTR reportPentest letterRisk register
Cited as
SOC 2 reads it as monitoring (CC7.1) + risk identification (CC4.1). ISO as technical vuln management (A.8.8). HIPAA as risk analysis & evaluation. NIST as flaw remediation (3.14.1).
Vendor / third-party risk management
CC9.2
A.5.19, A.5.20, A.5.21
§164.308(b); §164.314(a)
3.1.20, 3.16.1, 3.16.3
What you produce
A vendor inventory with tiering, signed agreements (DPA / BAA / flow-down clauses), the most recent SOC 2 / ISO report on file for each tier-1 vendor, and an annual review log.
Vendor inventoryBAAs / DPAsSub-service reportsAnnual review
Cited as
SOC 2 as vendor & business-partner management (CC9.2). ISO as supplier security (A.5.19–21). HIPAA as business-associate contracts. NIST as external-system relationships (3.1.20).
Incident response & breach disclosure
CC7.3, CC7.4, CC7.5
A.5.24–A.5.28
§164.308(a)(6); §164.410
3.6.1, 3.6.2, 3.6.3
What you produce
An incident response plan, the most recent tabletop exercise report, your incident log for the audit period, and disclosure-template letters mapped to each regulator's clock (HIPAA 60 days, GDPR 72 hours, state breach laws).
IR plan + RACITabletop after-actionIncident logDisclosure templates
Cited as
SOC 2 as incident detection / response / communication (CC7.3–5). ISO as information-security incident management. HIPAA as security incident procedures + breach notification. NIST as the 800-171 IR family (3.6).
Excerpt from our internal crosswalk · click any row to see the evidence pattern · Request the full sheet →
Pick a path
Lead Active Cross-cutting
Not sure? Talk to a senior
§ II · Industries

Start here if you know what you do.

Each card is a vertical we serve. The framework chips below show what applies: bold chips lead the engagement, the rest are paired or follow.

§ 01 · Healthcare & life sciences
Lead practice

Hospitals, dental, medical practices & health-tech.

6 frameworks
§ 02 · Financial services & FinTech
Lead practice

Banks, lenders, payments, wealth, insurtech.

7 frameworks
§ 03 · Accounting & professional services
Active practice

CPA firms, tax, audit & advisory.

§ 04 · Insurance
Active practice

Carriers, brokers, MGAs & adjusters.

5 frameworks Insurance playbook →
§ 05 · Government contractors (GovCon)
Lead practice · CCPs

DoD primes & subs, federal civilian, cleared work.

5 frameworks · L3 when DoD scopes
§ 06 · B2B SaaS & technology
Lead practice

Startups, scale-ups, enterprise software.

6 frameworks
§ Cross-cutting · Any firm building or using AI
Cross-cutting

AI governance applies on top of whatever you already run.

5 frameworks · sits alongside your industry stack AI governance practice →
§ III · Frameworks

Start here if you know which standard.

Twenty-two frameworks grouped by family. Bold left-edge marker = a practice we lead with. Click any card for the deep page.

Trust & assurance 6 frameworks

The attestations and certifications enterprise buyers ask for first: SOC 2, the ISO management-system family, and continuity. We lead with SOC 2 and ISO 27001.

Federal & defense 5 frameworks

CMMC and FedRAMP are the two doors into federal work in 2026. NIST 800-171 sits underneath both. CCPs on staff: FedRAMP-experienced practitioners.

Healthcare 2 frameworks

HIPAA is the law. HITRUST is the framework auditors and partners ask you to prove HIPAA against. We run them as a pair.

Financial 3 frameworks

The three federal regimes financial firms run against: plus PCI for anyone touching card data. We lead the FTC Safeguards rewrite for non-bank lenders and FinTech.

Privacy 5 frameworks

Privacy used to be one statute. Now it's a patchwork: federal sectoral laws, state omnibus laws, EU regulation, and tax-prep rules. We map your data flows once and walk you through every regime that applies.

AI governance 5 frameworks

The AI-specific frameworks: certifiable management systems, voluntary risk frameworks, regulation, and the two practitioner threat models that map AI risk to actual attacks.

§ IV · Engage

Tell us which standard. Or which audit is on the calendar.

A 30-minute call with a senior practitioner: no junior account team, no marketing intake. We’ll tell you what's in scope, what isn't, and whether we're the right firm for it.

or directly [email protected] · we reply within 24 hours