Jack Giordano
USMC · M.S. Cybersecurity · M.S. Security & Resiliency · BC Law Security, Risk & Governance
We are a small, deliberately senior firm: eight principals, no juniors on file. Every memo is signed by the practitioner who wrote it.
I left the Marine Corps, worked technical rescue, and moved into cybersecurity, and watched well-run companies get told the same thing by three different consultancies: buy a tool, hire a junior, accept a nine-month timeline. The deals waiting on the audit died on the table. The investors' diligence questions sat unanswered. The model that was about to ship sat in legal review for another quarter.
I built Nexurion as the firm I would have wanted on the other side of the table: senior practitioners only, written scoping memos in forty-eight hours, fixed fees you can put in a board update. We write the memo, we sign the deliverable, and we are still on the call when the auditor has a follow-up six months later.
If you have a buyer asking for SOC 2, a regulator asking for the AIMS scope, an investor asking about the AI policy, or a model about to ship into a regulated market: tell us the trigger. If we are the right firm we will tell you so in writing. If we are not, we will tell you that too, and point you to who is.
Every engagement at Nexurion is led by a principal: not a manager with junior leverage underneath. Below: the eight people who do the work. Their certifications are real, their tenure is real, and the bio is the one that shows up on the LinkedIn message you send them.
USMC · M.S. Cybersecurity · M.S. Security & Resiliency · BC Law Security, Risk & Governance
JD · CIPP/E · CIPM · 15+ yrs
CISSP · CISM · 25+ yrs
CCSK · AWS · Azure · GCP
U.S. Army · CISM · CMMC · NIST
CMMC · NIST · FISMA
CISSP · CCP · FedRAMP · CMMC
CISSP · CCP · FedRAMP · GovCloud
A short ledger of the engagements we'd point a buyer to. Three are named with permission. Three are under NDA: described by sector, scope, and outcome only. Every entry below is a real audit Nexurion took to "ready" in the last twelve months.
Inherited a control environment scoring 44% against SOC 2 with 10,000+ open vulnerabilities. Rebuilt the policy stack, re-architected access and logging, ran the remediation sprint, and walked the client into the auditor's room at 100%: in under a month.
Stood up the IT environment from zero, took it through ISO 27001 implementation and audit, and now operate the environment as their managed security partner.
Delivered a board-defensible internal audit report in three weeks: scope, evidence, gaps, and remediation plan in a single document the leadership team could act on immediately.
Audit-ready for SOC 2: full Trust Services Criteria mapping, control implementation, and evidence package handed to the auditor.
Took a multi-hundred-person services firm audit-ready for ISO 20000 (service management) and ISO 22301 (business continuity) in parallel, in a single month: including the integrated control map across both frameworks.
Currently driving CMMC Level 2 audit-readiness: 110 NIST 800-171 controls, a CUI enclave, and the SSP/POAM package the C3PAO will assess against.
Numbers are pulled from project closeout memos, not marketing material. NDA entries are described accurately enough for a buyer to vet the work without identifying the client. References available under mutual NDA on request.
Nexurion helped us bring our infrastructure to the next level. We’re now much more conscious about IT decisions and have transparency into our security posture.
Most firms tell you what they do. We think it's more useful to tell you what we won't. If your engagement looks like one of these, we'll write it in the memo and tell you to call someone else.
No platform kickbacks, no affiliate fees, no preferred-partner margin. We recommend the tool that fits, and tell you when the one you own is fine. Our revenue is your fee, full stop.
Every engagement is led and delivered by a named principal. If a senior practitioner won't do the work themselves, we don't take it.
The memo, the SSP, the readiness package, the board report: all written and signed by the practitioner whose name is on it. No rebadging, no offshore subcontracting.
Every engagement starts with a written scoping memo because every environment is different. If the work fits a template, you don't need us, and we'll say so.
If your problem is procurement, hire procurement. We solve the controls, the architecture, the policy, and the audit posture, not the purchase order.
If the work is genuinely junior, there are good firms for that and we're not one of them. We take engagements where seniority materially changes the outcome.
When we say yes, it's because a senior practitioner believes the work needs senior hands. When we say no, that is the most useful thing we can tell you in the memo.
If you're researching a senior firm, you have predictable questions. We'd rather settle them here than waste a discovery call. Click any question for the honest answer.
No. We take no software referral fees, no GRC platform commissions, no SIEM affiliate margin, no "preferred partner" kickbacks. The fee you pay us is the only money the firm makes on your engagement.
If we recommend a tool, it's because that tool fits the environment: and we will tell you when the tool you already own is the right one.
The named principal on the SOW does the work. Period. No analyst-and-PM-with-a-script model. If a senior practitioner doesn't want to do the work themselves, we don't take the work.
You can see the bench in § II. The principal assigned to your engagement is named in the scoping memo before you sign.
Fixed-fee for defined scope. The scoping memo includes the fee, the deliverable list, the timeline, and the named practitioner. You can put the number in the budget before you sign.
Where we run an environment past the audit (e.g. fractional CISO, ongoing managed compliance), we move to a monthly retainer at a written rate. No hourly billing, no scope-creep change orders, no "we'll true it up later."
This hasn't happened, but it's the right question. Our engagement standard is "audit-ready": meaning we believe a competent auditor will issue an unqualified opinion against the in-scope criteria.
If the auditor identifies a finding that originated in work we delivered, we remediate it at our cost until the finding is closed. That commitment is in the SOW, in writing. If the finding is in scope we explicitly excluded: or in work the client did themselves: we'll help, but on a separate fee.
Send it to [email protected]. If it's the kind of question other buyers also ask, we'll add it here.
Five questions. One reply. Tell us the trigger: an enterprise buyer, a regulator, an investor, a model that's about to ship: and within forty-eight hours a senior practitioner sends a written scoping memo: what's in scope, what isn't, the realistic calendar, and the fee range.
If the right answer is "don't engage us yet," we'll write that too.
The memo is the value exchange. No pitch deck. No nurture sequence. No partner-of-the-week call. If the memo lands and you want to talk, the booking link is at the bottom of it.
Nexurion Field Notes, Vol. I, our inaugural issue: published Apr 2026. Next volume lands the next morning either way.